Publications

The European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) is an intergovernmental organization dedicated to funding and coordinating scientific and technological research in Europe, fostering collaboration among researchers and institutions across countries. Recently, COST Action funded the “Genome Editing to treat Human Diseases” (GenE-HumDi) network, uniting various stakeholders such as pharmaceutical companies, academic institutions, regulatory agencies, biotech firms, and patient advocacy groups. GenE-HumDi’s primary objective is to expedite the application of genome editing for therapeutic purposes in treating human diseases. To achieve this goal, GenE-HumDi is organized in several working groups, each focusing on specific aspects. These groups aim to enhance genome editing technologies, assess delivery systems, address safety concerns, promote clinical translation, and develop regulatory guidelines. The network seeks to establish standard procedures and guidelines for these areas to standardize scientific practices and facilitate knowledge sharing. Furthermore, GenE-HumDi aims to communicate its findings to the public in accessible yet rigorous language, emphasizing genome editing’s potential to revolutionize the treatment of many human diseases. The inaugural GenE-HumDi meeting, held in Granada, Spain, in March 2023, featured presentations from experts in the field, discussing recent breakthroughs in delivery methods, safety measures, clinical translation, and regulatory aspects related to gene editing.

Genome editing for the treatment of human disease (GenE-HumDi) is an EU-funded COST Action for the development and consolidation of academic, industrial and healthcare feedback networks aiming to accelerate, foster and harmonize the approval of genome-editing (GE) therapies. GenE-HumDi offers mobility grants, supports educational courses, and hosts conferences and meetings to promote synergistic interactions among and across partners active in the discovery, validation, optimization, manufacturing and clinical application of genomic medicines. Furthermore, it provides young and early career scientists with a supportive and world-class environment to foster networking and international collaborations within the GE field. We compiled the proceedings of the second Annual GenE-HumDi Meeting held in Limassol, Cyprus, in 2024. Over three days, renowned experts from the field updated an audience of over 70 GenE-HumDi members and non-member scientists on the latest discoveries and ongoing projects, discussed the status of the field, and identified GenE-HumDi action priorities to advance research and development for GE medicines. Seven focused discussion groups identified gaps in knowledge, standardization and dissemination for new GE tools, delivery methods, safety monitoring, validation for clinical use, and progress in industrial manufacturing and regulatory issues. Simultaneously, publicity about the event itself contributed to outreach and dissemination of GE for human diseases. Therefore, the conclusions of that meeting, summarized here, serve as a compass toward GE application in Europe through coordination, enhanced collaboration and focus on critical developments.

In the past decade, precise targeting through genome editing has emerged as a promising alternative to traditional therapeutic approaches. Genome editing can be performed using various platforms, where programmable DNA nucleases create permanent genetic changes at specific genomic locations due to their ability to recognize precise DNA sequences. Clinical application of this technology requires the delivery of the editing reagents to transplantable cells ex vivo or to tissues and organs for in vivo approaches, often representing a barrier to achieving the desired editing efficiency and safety. In this review, authored by members of the GenE-HumDi European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) Action, we described the plethora of delivery systems available for genome-editing components, including viral and non-viral systems, highlighting their advantages, limitations, and potential application in a clinical setting.

Iron overload-driven liver fibrosis is a major concern in β-thalassaemia patients, but non-invasive or minimally invasive biomarkers for fibrosis staging remain limited. This study evaluated five plasma microRNAs (let-7a, miR-21, miR-29a, miR-34a, and miR-122) as potential markers for distinguishing liver fibrosis stages in β-thalassaemia. Plasma samples from 40 patients with fibrosis stages F0-F1 to F4 were analysed using RT-qPCR, normalised against the arithmetic mean of reference miRNAs miR-16 and miR-221. Expression levels of candidate miRNAs showed no statistically significant variation across stages, and logistic regression and ROC analyses revealed fair discriminatory performance for individual miRNAs and their combinations in selected stage comparisons. Notably, while for the discrimination of different fibrosis stages all five candidate miRNAs tested showed fair area-under-the-curve values between 0.7 and 0.8 individually and up to 0.917 in combination, none of these findings reached statistical significance. These results suggest that while the selected set of miRNAs reflects liver injury, its performance for precise fibrosis staging in β-thalassaemia is limited. A key cause for the low discriminatory power of these miRNAs may be the overall change of the blood miRNA transcriptome in haemoglobinopathies. The results indicate the need for validation in larger cohorts based on larger miRNA panels or the use of alternative source materials to improve diagnostic performance.

The therapeutic use of adeno-associated viral vector (AAV)-mediated gene disruption using CRISPR-Cas9 is limited by potential off-target modifications and the risk of uncontrolled integration of vector genomes into CRISPR-mediated double-strand breaks. To address these concerns, we explored the use of AAV-delivered paired Staphylococcus aureus nickases (D10ASaCas9) to target the Hao1 gene for the treatment of primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1). Our study demonstrated effective Hao1 gene disruption, a significant decrease in glycolate oxidase expression, and a therapeutic effect in PH1 mice. The assessment of undesired genetic modifications through CIRCLE-seq and CAST-Seq analyses revealed neither off-target activity nor chromosomal translocations. Importantly, the use of paired-D10ASaCas9 resulted in a significant reduction in AAV integration at the target site compared to SaCas9 nuclease. In addition, our study highlights the limitations of current analytical tools in characterizing modifications introduced by paired D10ASaCas9, necessitating the development of a custom pipeline for more accurate characterization. These results describe a positive advance towards a safe and effective potential long-term treatment for PH1 patients.